Review software for work that gets read by a court.
A UAD 3.6 appraisal review workspace and the client request and quoting flow, for a firm whose output carries legal weight.
An appraisal is a legal document, not a form submission.
Appraisal review is governed work. A reviewer has to see what changed, why it changed, and who changed it, and the record of that has to hold up long after everyone has forgotten the file. The software cannot quietly normalize anything.
A review workspace and the client path that feeds it.
The reviewer side is a UAD 3.6 workspace built around findings rather than fields: what is wrong, how severe, and what the suggested correction is, with the original always visible beside it.
The client side is the other half of the same product, a validated two-step request, a private status link, and an explicit quote before any money is discussed.
[Add what you are willing to say publicly about this engagement.]
[Volume reviewed, turnaround time, or simply that it is in daily use. Client work often needs their sign-off before it goes on a public page, so this stays blank until you have it.]